Ex-CNN editor Chris Cilizza conceded on Monday that he "screwed up" in his assessment of the lab leak theory, suggesting that President Trump was likely right about COVID's origins.
As part of a rash of executive orders completed on his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump began the nation’s exit from the World Health Organization. Here, we explain how the withdrawal would work and what it would mean,
Trump returns to the White House as the tenth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic once again inundates hospitals, while the last vestiges of public health are set for destruction.
Public health experts say there could be massive implications after President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the U.S. from the World Health Organization.
Donald Trump has pulled the US out of the World Health Organisation (WHO), stating that the global health organisation mishandled the Covid-19 pandemic. In one of his first executive orders, the President said the agency failed to act independently from the “inappropriate political influence of WHO member states”.
In a day-one executive order, President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the World Health Organization for a second time.
As he signed an executive order, President Donald Trump said that the World Health Organization had "ripped us off."
President Donald Trump discussed his thoughts on the World Health Organization, expanding on some of the reasons he withdrew from the agency.
Mr Trump blamed previous administrations’ efforts to promote diversity at federal agencies for contributing to the crash.
Fauci served as the leading US infectious disease expert during the COVID-19 pandemic, was under security provided by the NIH.
US President Donald Trump recently ordered a US exit due to dissatisfaction with WHO handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other health crises.
In 2020, Trump was highly critical of the WHO for being too "China-centric" in its tackling of Covid-19, and the organisation has since become a "target" of US conservatives over its work on a global pandemic treaty that they view as a "threat to American sovereignty", said the The New York Times.