Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President Donald Trump. The court did, in fact, issue a series of conservative decisions ...

The legacy that I'm leaving, I hope it's bigger than me.” Data and insights powered by #paid Advertisement © 2025 TIME USA, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our ...

Many legal commentators apparently believe that, in the term that just ended, the Supreme Court further enabled President ...

In letters made public via the Freedom of Information Act, Attorney General Pam Bondi argued the president has the authority ...

TikTok races to launch a U.S.-based version of its platform by September 5 in a bid to avoid a federal ban and navigate ...

TikTok owner ByteDance is developing a replacement app intended for US-based users, according to a report, as President Trump ...

The U.S. government would initiate deportation proceedings against Kilmar Abrego Garcia if he's released from jail before he ...

NPR speaks with Zachary Price, law professor at the University of California College of Law San Francisco, about the Trump administration's rationale for exempting tech companies from the TikTok ban.

The justices concluded that kids’ access to online porn is serious enough to change the ground rules of First Amendment law, ...

Still, claiming that the president has inherent powers to nullify represents an unprecedented power grab by the Trump ...

The high court has given the president immunity and protected him from nationwide injunctions. Congress is giving ground on ...

The Supreme Court categorically rejected the argument that the mere regulation of an algorithm raises First Amendment ...